Archive
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- June 2015
- April 2015
- December 2014
- October 2014
- August 2014
- May 2014
- February 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- June 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- January 2012
- May 2011
Strategies for coping with slow-steaming, new paper
The trend of reduced sailing speed, or slow-steaming, presents shippers with new, complex challenges. SSPA has together with Chalmers University of Technology and University of Gothenburg studied how the Swedish industry has met and managed these challenges. The study has recently been published in Journal of Shipping and Trade.
In this exploratory case study, the answers to the questions of how the shippers’ systems are affected by the widespread application of slow-steaming and how shippers manage these consequences are sought. To do so, a multiple case study consisting of six Swedish multi-national companies has been undertaken. The case study is based on data collected from interviews, seminars and workshops, secondary data, and literature reviews.
The shippers developed a set of strategies to cope with the low punctuality of containerised shipping, and these were categorised in the domains of transfer-the-problem, transport, sourcing and distribution, logistics and manufacturing, and product design.
- All firms applied changes in the transport domain, although the lack of service segmentation limited the effects of the strategy, says Christian Finnsgård, Head of Research at SSPA.
Examples of strategies
Coping by transferring the problem up- or downstream
The companies tasked the suppliers to minimising their delivery times, or the customer has to accept the longer lead times.
Coping by changed transport system
The companies are locating production facilities closer to the market they supply in order to reduce the lead time to their customers.
Coping by changed sourcing
The companies selects suppliers that are geographically closer or sourcing generic components to expand the lead time gap .
Coping by changed logistics and manufacturing concept
The companies expand the lead time gap by stocking production facilities closer to markets with generic components based on sales forecasts.
Coping by redesigning the product
The companies reduce lead time by redesigning their product range to be able to assemble a large range of products from a handful of generic components.
About the paper
The paper; “Swedish shippers’ strategies for coping with slow-steaming in deep sea container shipping”, published in Journal of Shipping and Trade (2018) 3:8. Co-authored by Christian Finnsgård, SSPA Sweden, Joakim Kalantari, VTI, Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute (and formerly at the time of the study, at SSPA), Zeeshan Raza, University of Gothenburg, Violeta Roso, Chalmers University of Technology and Johan Woxenius, University of Gothenburg. This research was funded by the Swedish Maritime Administration.
Abstract
When container shipping lines experience over-capacity and high fuel costs, they typically respond by decreasing sailing speeds and, consequently, increasing transport time. Most of the literature on this phenomenon, often referred to as slow-steaming, takes the perspective of the shipping lines addressing technical, operational and financial effects, or a society perspective focusing on lower emissions and energy use. Few studies investigate the effects on the demand side of the market for container liner shipping. Hence, the aim of this study is to elaborate on the logistics consequences of slow-steaming, particularly the strategies that Swedish shippers purchasing deep sea container transport services employ to mitigate the effects of slow-steaming. Workshops and semi-structured interviews revealed that shippers felt they had little or no impact on sailing schedules and were more or less subject to container shipping lines’ decisions. The effects of slow-steaming were obviously most severe for firms with complex supply chains, where intermediate products are sent back and forth between production stages on different continents. The shippers developed a set of strategies to cope with the low punctuality of containerised shipping, and these were categorised in the domains of transfer-the-problem, transport, sourcing and distribution, logistics and manufacturing, and product design. All firms applied changes in the transport domain, although the lack of service segmentation limited the effects of the strategy. Most measures were applied by two firms, whereas only one firm changed the product design.
The article is available online at jshippingandtrade
Costs, not SECAs make RoRo steam slow
The issue of speed is more complex for RoRo/RoPax vessels than other segments. A Swedish team with researchers has addressed the preconditions for introducing slow steaming in Northern Europe and asked operators how they prepared and have acted under SECA. An article about this study was recently published in HANSA International Maritime Journal.
Slow Steaming Logistics - the shippers’ challenges following slower sailing speeds
The Slow Steaming Logistics project aims to study how the industry has met and managed these new challenges, in order to create the knowledge base necessary for designing supply chains optimized for slow steaming.